![]() Perhaps we should just leave asbestos in the ground and not dig it up in the first place. ![]() May I point out that if the asbestos was not incorporated in the construction in the first place, neither of those risks would apply. Secondly, he argues that the risks of asbestos removal from the buildings may be higher than those of leaving the asbestos as part of the structure. This is, however, a bit overshadowed by approximately one million people who died over the past decade from asbestos-related illness worldwide. I am very happy that letter-writer Don Graham is in good health despite working as an asbestos miner. ![]() Re: Former Asbestos Miner Says The Risk Is Acceptable, letter to the editor, Sept. But not for long - Ted’s replacement on the national affairs panel was Preston Manning. After an extensive search for a replacement, we landed on a relative unknown at the time. Finally the word came down from Toronto: Byfield had to go, not because his cogent arguments about Western alienation were winning the rhetorical battles, but because his approach was “too confrontational.” I thought it made great radio, but it did not correspond with St. Instead, Ted took a distinctly “the West has been screwed” point of view, and, week after week, he mopped the floor with his eastern counterparts. Ted didn’t play fair, rejecting Peter’s “we’re all in this together” approach to looking at Canada. Always grappling for a Western voice, the panel in settled on a gruff Edmontonian named Ted Byfield. Highly influential, the panel featured prominent national affairs observers such as Dalton Camp, Lysianne Gagnon and Stephen Lewis. In the mid-’80s I helped produce a weekly panel for Peter Gzowski’s Morningside CBC Radio program on national affairs. Re: The West’s Long Trip To Ottawa, Kevin Libin, Sept 17.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |